Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39106991›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024

Family-centred care interventions in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review of randomised controlled trials providing a menu of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods.

Ilaria Mariani, Cecilia Laure Juliette Vuillard, Jenny Bua, Martina Girardelli, Marzia Lazzerini

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations for anti-racist, equity-focused NICU family mental health.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation of family-centered care in Pediatric Gastroscopy.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilaria MarianiWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4788
Cecilia Laure Juliette VuillardNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy cecilialaurejuliette.vuillard@burlo.trieste.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5947-9842
Jenny BuaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-0701
Martina GirardelliDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1186-4907
Marzia LazzeriniWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-2198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenefits of different types of family-centred care (FCC) interventions in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have been reported. However, a comprehensive review of existing FCC intervention studies was lacking.

objectiveThis review aimed at synthesising the characteristics of FCC interventions, related outcomes and measurement methods in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in NICU, and providing menus of options to favour implementation and further research.

methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 31 January 2022. Interventions were mapped according to five categories as defined by a previous Cochrane review. We described outcome types, measurement populations, measurement methods and timelines. Subgroup analyses were also performed.

resultsOut of 6583 studies identified, 146 met eligibility criteria. Overall, 52 (35.6%) RCTs tested more than one category of intervention, with a large variety of combinations, with the most frequent category of intervention being the educational (138 RCTs, 94.5%). We identified a total of 77 different intervention packages, and RCTs comparing the same interventions were lacking. The 146 RCTs reported on 425 different outcomes, classified in 13 major categories with parental mental health (61 RCTs, 41.8% of total RCTs) being the most frequent category in parents, and neurobehavioural/developmental outcomes being the most frequent category in newborns (62 RCTs, 42.5%). For several categories of outcomes almost every RCT used a different measurement method. Educational interventions targeting specifically staff, fathers, siblings and other family members were lacking or poorly described. Only one RCT measured outcomes in health workers, two in siblings and none considered other family members.

conclusionsA large variety of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods were used in FCC studies in NICU. The derived menus of options should be helpful for researchers and policy makers to identify interventions most suitable in each setting and to further standardise research methods.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCaregiversInfantNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID39106991
PMCPMC11664360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.