ArticleEBioMedicine2024
Machine learning of brain-specific biomarkers from EEG.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting big five personality traits from resting-state EEG connectivity: a connectome predictive modeling study.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Multimodal neuroimaging discrimination of Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and late-life depression using electroencephalography and functional near-infrared spectroscopy: integrating electrophysiological and hemodynamic biomarkers.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Benchmarking the utility of dry-electrode electroencephalography for clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The UBE3A-ATS antisense oligonucleotide rugonersen in children with Angelman syndrome: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- [Research progress in electroencephalogram-based brain age prediction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Exploring the neuromagnetic signatures of cognitive decline from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- GREEN: A lightweight architecture using learnable wavelets and Riemannian geometry for biomarker exploration with EEG signals.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- EEG connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia revealed by machine learning.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An adaptive transformer-based framework for advanced brain activity mapping and intelligent neurotherapeutic decision support.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Brain age revisited: Investigating the state vs. trait hypotheses of EEG-derived brain-age dynamics with deep learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Clinically altered brain activity may not look like aged brain activity: Implications for brain-age modeling and biomarker strategies.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectroencephalography (EEG) has a long history as a clinical tool to study brain function, and its potential to derive biomarkers for various applications is far from exhausted. Machine learning (ML) can guide future innovation by harnessing the wealth of complex EEG signals to isolate relevant brain activity. Yet, ML studies in EEG tend to ignore physiological artefacts, which may cause problems for deriving biomarkers specific to the central nervous system (CNS).
methodsWe present a framework for conceptualising machine learning from CNS versus peripheral signals measured with EEG. A signal representation based on Morlet wavelets allowed us to define traditional brain activity features (e.g. log power) and alternative inputs used by state-of-the-art ML approaches based on covariance matrices. Using more than 2600 EEG recordings from large public databases (TUAB, TDBRAIN), we studied the impact of peripheral signals and artefact removal techniques on ML models in age and sex prediction analyses.
findingsAcross benchmarks, basic artefact rejection improved model performance, whereas further removal of peripheral signals using ICA decreased performance. Our analyses revealed that peripheral signals enable age and sex prediction. However, they explained only a fraction of the performance provided by brain signals.
interpretationWe show that brain signals and body signals, both present in the EEG, allow for prediction of personal characteristics. While these results may depend on specific applications, our work suggests that great care is needed to separate these signals when the goal is to develop CNS-specific biomarkers using ML.
fundingAll authors have been working for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.