Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39106151›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

Asymptomatic Incidence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Preclinical Duration to Myeloma Diagnosis: A Modeling Study.

Mengmeng Ji, Yi-Hsuan Shih, John H Huber, Mei Wang, Eric J Feuer, Ruth Etzioni, Shi-Yi Wang, Su-Hsin Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mengmeng JiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-1205-0369
Yi-Hsuan ShihDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-8230
John H HuberDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-5245-5187
Mei WangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-3560-9460
Eric J FeuerDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-7751
Ruth EtzioniFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-6370
Shi-Yi WangSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-5784
Su-Hsin ChangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-5872-9556

Funding

Comparative modeling of multiple myeloma across myeloma control continuuum: prevention, treatment, and disparity reductionU01CA265735 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, SU-HSIN, WANG, SHIYI · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Addressing racial disparities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and progression to multiple myeloma from a prevention perspectiveR01CA253475 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, SU-HSIN · 2020 to 2022
$1.1M
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (SCC)Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital (FBJH)NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253475NCI NIH HHS U01 CA265735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the premalignant condition of multiple myeloma. Given a lack of population-based screening for MGUS and its asymptomatic nature, the epidemiology of MGUS remains unknown. This study estimated age- and race/ethnicity-specific MGUS incidence and preclinical duration from MGUS to multiple myeloma in the United States.

methodsA previously published modeling approach was used to calculate national MGUS incidence using estimates of MGUS prevalence, multiple myeloma incidence, multiple myeloma-specific and all-cause mortality, and population age distribution from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 2000 to 2021. The estimated MGUS prevalence was divided by MGUS incidence to obtain preclinical duration of multiple myeloma.

resultsMGUS incidence for non-Hispanic White (NHW) populations was 52, 86, 142, and 181 and for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) population was 110, 212, 392, and 570 per 100,000 person-years at ages 50, 60, 70, and 80 years, respectively. The average preclinical duration was 20.5 (95% confidence interval, CI, 16.5-26.1) years for the NHW population and 14.2 (95% CI, 11.5-17.6) years for the NHB population. The cumulative risk of developing MGUS in age 50 to 85 was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7%-4.2%) for the NHW population and 6.1% (95% CI, 3.8%-10.0%) for the NHB population.

conclusionsNHB populations had a higher MGUS incidence rate at all ages and a shorter preclinical duration of multiple myeloma compared to their NHW counterparts. IMPACT: This study provides insights into the epidemiology of MGUS and enhances our understanding of the natural history of multiple myeloma. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1547.

Indexed as

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39106151
PMCPMC11611677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.