Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39106067›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Adjuvant Everolimus in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shuchi Gulati, Catherine Tangen, Christopher W Ryan, Ulka N Vaishampayan, Brian M Shuch, Pedro C Barata, Deepak K Pruthi, Cristiane D Bergerot, Abhishek Tripathi, Seth P Lerner and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01120249 (EVEREST), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01120249 phase3completednot on this map

EVEREST: EVErolimus for Renal Cancer Ensuing Surgical Therapy, A Phase III Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2011 to 2025Enrolled1,545ConditionsKidney CancerArmseverolimus, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shuchi GulatiUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento.
Catherine TangenSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Christopher W RyanOregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland.
Ulka N VaishampayanRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Brian M ShuchUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Pedro C BarataUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Deepak K PruthiUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio.
Cristiane D BergerotOncoclinicas, Brasilia, Brazil.
Abhishek TripathiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Seth P LernerBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ian M ThompsonCHRISTUS Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, Texas.
Primo N LaraUniversity of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento.
Sumanta K PalCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XIWEI WU · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Michael M Ittmann · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Grace B Gill · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
UCDCCC NCTN UG1 PROGRAMUG1CA233340 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GANDARA, DAVID R, VALICENTI, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3.7M
Combination of Transcriptomic and Metallomic Biomarkers for Risk Assessment in Locoregional Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaK08CA273542 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Shuchi Gulati · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA273542NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trial data on adjuvant therapy in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are scant. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adjuvant everolimus after nephrectomy on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with localized papillary and chromophobe RCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, EVEREST, included patients enrolled between April 1, 2011, and September 15, 2016. Eligible patients had fully resected RCC at intermediate-high risk (pT1 grade 3-4, N0 to pT3a grade 1-2, N0) or very-high risk (pT3a grade 3-4 to pT4 any grade or N+) for recurrence who had received radical or partial nephrectomy. Final analyses was completed in March 2022. Intervention: The intervention group received 54 weeks of everolimus (10 mg orally daily); the control group received a matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were RFS, OS, and rates of adverse events. For testing the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment effect, a Cox regression model was used for both OS and RFS. Results: Of 1545 adult patients with treatment-naive, nonmetastatic, fully resected RCC in EVEREST, 109 had papillary RCC (median [range] age, 60 [19-81] years; 82 [75%] male; 50 patients [46%] with very high-risk disease) and 99 had chromophobe RCC (median [range] age 51 [18-71] years; 53 [54%] male; 34 patients [34%] with very high-risk disease). Among 57 patients with papillary RCC in the intervention group, 26 (46%) completed 54 weeks of treatment, and among 53 patients with chromophobe RCC in the intervention group, 26 (49%) completed 54 weeks of treatment. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 76 (61-96) months, adjuvant everolimus did not improve RFS compared with placebo in either papillary RCC (5-year RFS: 62% vs 70%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.61-2.33; P = .61) or chromophobe RCC (5-year RFS: 79% vs 77%; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.37-2.13; P = .79). In the combined non-clear RCC cohort, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 48% of patients who received everolimus and 9% of patients who received placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinical trial assessing the use of adjuvant everolimus, postoperative everolimus did not show evidence of improved RFS among patients with papillary or chromophobe RCC, and results from the study do not support adjuvant everolimus for this cohort. However, since the lower bounds of the 95% CIs were 0.61 and 0.89, respectively, potential treatment benefit in these subgroups cannot be ruled out. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01120249.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellEverolimusKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimus

Identifiers

PMID39106067
PMCPMC11304111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.