Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105938›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

The prediction-confirmation account of the sense of body ownership: Evidence from a rubber hand illusion paradigm.

Loïc P Heurley, Léa Obrecht, Hélène Vanborren, Fleur Touzard, Thibaut Brouillet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Loïc P HeurleyLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAE)-Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue, 92001, de La République, Nanterre Cedex, France. heurleyloic@yahoo.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-6083
Léa ObrechtLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAE)-Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue, 92001, de La République, Nanterre Cedex, France.
Hélène VanborrenLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAE)-Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue, 92001, de La République, Nanterre Cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0844-6517
Fleur TouzardLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAE)-Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue, 92001, de La République, Nanterre Cedex, France.
Thibaut BrouilletLaboratoire sur les Interactions Cognition, Action, Émotion (LICAE)-Université Paris Nanterre, 200 avenue, 92001, de La République, Nanterre Cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-3188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the contribution of multisensory predictions to body ownership, and beyond, to the integration of body-related signals. Contrary to the prevailing idea, according to which, to be integrated, cues necessarily have to be perceived simultaneously, we instead proposed the prediction-confirmation account. According to this account, a perceived cue can be integrated with a predicted cue as long as both signals are relatively simultaneous. To test this hypothesis, a standard rubber hand illusion (RHI) paradigm was used. In the first part of each trial, the illusion was induced while participants observed the rubber hand being touched with a paintbrush. In the subsequent part of the trial, (i) both rubber hand and the participant's real hand were stroked as before (i.e., visible/synchronous condition), (ii) the rubber hand was not stroke anymore (i.e., visible/tactile-only condition), or (iii) both rubber hand and the participant's real hand were synchronously stroked while the location where the rubber hand was touched was occulted (i.e., occulted/synchronous condition). However, in this latter condition, participants still perceived the approaching movement of the paintbrush. Thus, based on this visual cue, the participants can properly predict the timepoint at which the tactile cue should occur (i.e., visuotactile predictions). Our major finding was that compared with the visible/tactile-only condition, the occulted/synchronous condition did not exhibit a decrease of the RHI as in the visible/synchronous condition. This finding supports the prediction-confirmation account and suggests that this mechanism operates even in the standard version of the RHI.

Indexed as

Body ImageHandIllusionsProprioceptionTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBody representationMultimodal integrationTemporal synchronyVisuotactile prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.