Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105898›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2024

Participation of women in clinical studies of atrial fibrillation in the Northern Netherlands.

Neda Khalilian Ekrami, Dawid K Baron, Emelia J Benjamin, Bart A Mulder, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Michiel Rienstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing cardiovascular care-key insights from the Netherlands Heart Journal 2024.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  2. Understanding sex differences in cardiovascular medicine: a plea for combining clinical trials with real-world data.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  3. Equitable and specialised cardiovascular care in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neda Khalilian EkramiDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dawid K BaronDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emelia J BenjaminDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Bart A MulderDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Isabelle C Van GelderDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.rienstra@umcg.nl.

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON GENETIC VARIANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PR INTERVALR01HL092577 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$20.6M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association AHA_18SFRN34110082Dutch Cardiovascular Alliance 01-002-2022-0118NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092577NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL092577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConcerns exist of women underrepresentation in atrial fibrillation (AF) studies, potentially limiting the generalisability of study findings to women with AF. We assessed the participation of women in AF clinical studies performed at a tertiary care centre in the Northern Netherlands.

methodsEight AF clinical studies with screening logs were available for analysis. To identify sex-specific differences, patient inclusion and exclusion and reasons for exclusion were assessed. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated to evaluate the representation of women in the studies relative to the AF sex distribution of the general population in the Netherlands (2019 Global Burden of Disease study).

resultsWe included 1739 screened patients with AF in the analysis, of whom 722 (41.5%) were women. Of the patients screened, 161 (9%) were enrolled. Median age of screened patients was 69 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61-77), and women were older than men (71 years; IQR: 63-79 vs 68 years; IQR: 60-75; p < 0.001). Women were not underscreened compared with men (PPR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.10), disproportionally excluded (92% vs 90%; p = 0.10) or less willing to participate (17% vs 15%; p = 0.36). Women had an overall PPR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.05-1.06) compared with the general AF population.

conclusionAt our tertiary hospital in the Northern Netherlands, women appeared to be well-represented in AF studies. The current study advocates for the adoption of a more comprehensive measure of equity, such as the PPR, and screening log evaluation to improve the generalisability of study findings to the entire clinical AF population.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationClinical trialsSex differencesWomen representation

Identifiers

PMID39105898
PMCPMC11335698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.