Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105826›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2024

Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage.

Marcin Popiolek, Mats Lidén, Petros Georgouleas, Klara Sahlén, Pernilla Sundqvist, Johan Jendeberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcin PopiolekDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden. marcin.popiolek@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-2372
Mats LidénDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1346-1450
Petros GeorgouleasDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
Klara SahlénDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2793-6613
Pernilla SundqvistDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-5881
Johan JendebergDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

Region Örebro län OLL-935231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stone size and location are key factors in predicting spontaneous stone passage (SSP), but little attention has been paid to the influence of radiological signs of stone impaction (RSSI). This research aims to determine whether RSSI, alongside stone size, can predict SSP and to evaluate the consistency of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measurements among observers. In this retrospective study, 160 patients with a single upper or middle ureteral stone on acute non-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) were analysed. Patient data were collected from medical records. Measurements of RSSI, including UWT, ureteral diameters, and average attenuation above and below the stone, were taken on NCCT by four independent readers blind to the outcomes. The cohort consisted of 70% males with an average age of 51 ± 15. SSP occurred in 61% of patients over 20 weeks. The median stone length was 5.7 mm (IQR: 4.5-7.3) and was significantly shorter in patients who passed their stones at short- (4.6 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) and long-term (4.8 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) follow-up. For stone length, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting SSP was 0.90 (CI 0.84-0.96) and only increased to 0.91 (CI 0.85-0.95) when adding ureteral diameters and UWT. Ureteral attenuation did not predict SSP (AUC < 0.5). Interobserver variability for UWT was moderate, with ± 2.0 mm multi-reader limits of agreement (LOA). The results suggest that RSSI do not enhance the predictive value of stone size for SSP. UWT measurements exhibit moderate reliability with significant interobserver variability.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedUreteral CalculiAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRemission, SpontaneousRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUreterImpactionPassagePredictionUreteral stone

Identifiers

PMID39105826
PMCPMC11303465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.