ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Cost-efficient PCR based DNA barcoding of marine invertebrate specimens with NovaSeq amplicon sequencing.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mitochondrial DNA metabarcoding system based on tNGS enables multiplex identification of vertebrate species in samples containing degraded and mixed DNA.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2026Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe marine environment harbors high biodiversity; however, it is poorly understood. Nucleotide sequence data of all marine organisms should be accumulated before natural and/or anthropogenic environmental changes jeopardize the marine environment. In this study, we report a cost-effective and easy DNA barcoding method. This method can be readily adopted without using library preparation kits. It includes multiplex PCR of short targets, indexing PCR, and outsourcing to a sequencing service using the NovaSeq system. METHODS AND
resultsWe targeted four mitochondrial genes [cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), COIII, 16S rRNA (16S), and 12S rRNA (12S)] and three nuclear genes [18S rRNA (18S), 28S rRNA (28S), internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)] in 95 marine invertebrate specimens, which were primarily annelids. The primers, including adapters and indices for NovaSeq sequencing, were newly designed. Two PCR runs were conducted. The 1st PCR amplified specific loci with universal primers and the 2nd added sequencing adapters and indices to the 1st PCR products. The gene sequences obtained from the FASTQ files were subjected to BLAST search and phylogenetic analyses. One run using 95 specimens yielded sequences averaging 2816 bp per specimen for a total length of six loci. Nuclear genes were more successfully assembled compared with mitochondrial genes. A weak but significantly negative correlation was observed between the average length of each locus and success rate of the assembly. Some of the sequences were almost identical to the sequences obtained from specimens collected far from Japan, indicating the presence of potentially invasive species identified for the first time.
conclusionsWe obtained gene sequences efficiently using next-generation sequencing rather than Sanger sequencing. Although this method requires further optimization to increase the success rate for some loci, it is used as a first step to select specimens for further analyses by determining the specific loci of the targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39105821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.