Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105817›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2024

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a real-world study.

Guozhen Yang, Yutong Hong, Xiaomin Zhang, Chufeng Zeng, Linyu Tan, Xu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guozhen Yang *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yutong Hong *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomin ZhangSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chufeng ZengDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Linyu TanDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. xuz452866@gmail.com.

Funding

the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China 202103000064the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute Q202113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear.

methodsClinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks).

results152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group.

conclusionsDelayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaImmunotherapyIntervalPathological complete responsePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39105817
PMCPMC11303633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.