Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105811›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2024

Work absence and productivity loss of patients undergoing a trial of spontaneous passage for ureteral stones.

Ian Berger, Robert Medairos, Ezra Margolin, Jodi Antonelli, Michael E Lipkin, Charles D Scales, Deborah R Kaye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ian BergerDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA. ian.berger@duke.edu.
Robert MedairosDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA.
Ezra MargolinDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA.
Jodi AntonelliDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael E LipkinDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA.
Charles D ScalesDepartment of Urology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University National Clinician Scholars Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Deborah R KayeDepartment of Urology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Cancer Institute, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with ureteral stones are often managed with a spontaneous trial of passage. While cost effective, the current literature has not examined the effects of a trial of passage on patients' work productivity. In this study, we aim to characterize work absence and productivity losses in a cohort of patients undergoing a trial of passage for ureteral stones. Actively employed patients aged 18 to 64 and discharged from Duke emergency departments without surgical intervention for ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm were contacted by phone four weeks after their presentation. Participants completed the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire which assesses three domains: absenteeism - missed work; presenteeism -productivity when returning to work; and unpaid work - assistance with household work. Linear regression associated demographic and stone factors with productivity losses.109 patients completed the survey. In total, 67% of patients missed work, 46% had decreased productivity when returning to work, and 55% required assistance with unpaid work. 59% of patients with stones ≤ 5 mm missed work versus 84% with stones > 5 mm (p = 0.009). African American race (coefficient 23.68, 95% confidence interval 2.24-45.11, p = 0.031), first-time stone formers (coefficient 20.28, 95% confidence interval 2.50-38.07, p = 0.026), and patients with stones > 5 mm (coefficient 25.34, 95% CI 5.25-45.44, p = 0.014) were associated with increased productivity losses. The majority of patients miss work while undergoing a trial of passage and many have decreased productivity when returning to work. This information may help counsel patients in emergency departments, especially first-time stone formers, and prevent return visits.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismEfficiencyUreteral CalculiAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPresenteeismReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdultCost of IllnessKidney calculi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.