Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105777›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024

Anomalous anatomic variation of an absent deep inferior epigastric artery: implications for autologous breast reconstruction.

Jevan Cevik, Marie Rostek, Warren M Rozen

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jevan CevikDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia. jevancevik@gmail.com.
Marie RostekDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Warren M RozenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction using abdominally based perforator flaps has become increasingly popular following mastectomy for breast cancer. Of these, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap represents one of the most popular techniques. However, surgeons must remain cognizant of anatomic variations in the abdominal wall vasculature that could complicate or preclude planned DIEP flaps. In this case, a 64-year-old female with a history of prior tubal ligations and caesarean sections underwent preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for planned autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap. CTA revealed complete absence of the left deep inferior epigastric artery, with a sizeable left abdominal wall perforator visualized receiving retrograde flow from a crossing midline branch originating from the contralateral right deep inferior epigastric system. This vessel traversed the midline in a superficial plane in the subcutaneous tissue. Despite this aberrant anatomy, the surgical team successfully raised a unilateral DIEP flap based on the right pedicle. This case represents a unique anatomical variation of the abdominal wall and emphasises the importance of preoperative imaging when planning abdominally based free flaps.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationComputed Tomography AngiographyEpigastric ArteriesMammaplastyPerforator FlapAbdominal WallBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedTransplantation, AutologousAutologous breast ReconstructionComputed Tomographic AngiographyDeep inferior epigastric arteryDIEP flap

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.