Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105746›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Principles of artificial intelligence in radiooncology.

Yixing Huang, Ahmed Gomaa, Daniel Höfler, Philipp Schubert, Udo Gaipl, Benjamin Frey, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Florian Putz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The increasing role of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: how should we navigate it?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yixing HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. yixing.huang@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2627-3077
Ahmed GomaaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Daniel HöflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp SchubertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Udo GaiplComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Benjamin FreyComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Christoph BertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian PutzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the rapidly expanding field of artificial intelligence (AI) there is a wealth of literature detailing the myriad applications of AI, particularly in the realm of deep learning. However, a review that elucidates the technical principles of deep learning as relevant to radiation oncology in an easily understandable manner is still notably lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive guide to the principles of deep learning that is specifically tailored toward radiation oncology.

methodsIn light of the extensive variety of AI methodologies, this review selectively concentrates on the specific domain of deep learning. It emphasizes the principal categories of deep learning models and delineates the methodologies for training these models effectively.

resultsThis review initially delineates the distinctions between AI and deep learning as well as between supervised and unsupervised learning. Subsequently, it elucidates the fundamental principles of major deep learning models, encompassing multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), transformers, generative adversarial networks (GANs), diffusion-based generative models, and reinforcement learning. For each category, it presents representative networks alongside their specific applications in radiation oncology. Moreover, the review outlines critical factors essential for training deep learning models, such as data preprocessing, loss functions, optimizers, and other pivotal training parameters including learning rate and batch size.

conclusionThis review provides a comprehensive overview of deep learning principles tailored toward radiation oncology. It aims to enhance the understanding of AI-based research and software applications, thereby bridging the gap between complex technological concepts and clinical practice in radiation oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningNeoplasmsRadiation OncologyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningRadiation oncologyTutorial

Identifiers

PMID39105746
PMCPMC11839771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.