Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105603›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2025

Reported snakebite mortality and state compensation payments in Madhya Pradesh, India, from 2020 to 2022.

Priyanka Kadam, Bhupeshwari Patel, Maya Gopalakrishnan, Freston M Sirur, Omesh K Bharti, Amit Agrawal, Md Yunus, Dayal B Majumdar, Stuart Ainsworth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priyanka KadamSnakebite Healing and Education Society, Mumbai 400050, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-6650
Bhupeshwari PatelDepartment of Trauma & Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal 462026, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Maya GopalakrishnanDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0661-9854
Freston M SirurDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-2516
Omesh K BhartiState Institute of Health & Family Welfare, Kasumpti, Shimla 171009, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal 462026, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3287-5448
Md YunusDepartment of Trauma & Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal 462026, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Dayal B MajumdarCalcutta National Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata 700014, West Bengal, India.
Stuart AinsworthDepartment of Infection Biology and Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK.

Funding

RSTMHUKRI MR/S03398X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia experiences the highest snakebite burden globally, with 58 000 predicted deaths annually. The central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh is thought to have a substantial snakebite burden and provides compensation to families who can demonstrate by postmortem and hospital treatment reports that their relatives have died due to snakebite. This study represents the first report on the frequency of distribution of compensation for snakebite deaths in Madhya Pradesh.

methodsStatewide snakebite death compensation data from 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, provided by the Madhya Pradesh health authorities, were analysed alongside interviews with 15 families that described the events that ultimately led to their compensation claims.

resultsCompensation was paid to a total of 5728 families, with a total value equating to 22 912 Lakhs (approximately US${\$}$27.94 million). Families described commonly recognised snakebite risk factors and behaviours in the events that resulted in their relatives' deaths.

conclusionsThe snakebite burden in Madhya Pradesh is significant, both in terms of mortality and economic expenditure of the state. Sustained investment in preventative interventions, as well as monitoring of the rate of compensation payouts due to snakebite death as a measure of intervention effectiveness, should be considered to substantially reduce snakebite incidence and mortality.

Indexed as

Compensation and RedressSnake BitesAdultCost of IllnessFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorscompensationIndiaMadhya Pradeshsnakebitevenom

Identifiers

PMID39105603
PMCPMC11791426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.