Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105555›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2024

Assessing the domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO) approximation for non-covalent interactions in sizable supramolecular complexes.

Montgomery Gray, John M Herbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diagrammatic Simplification of Linearized Coupled Cluster Theory.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. On the Potential Energy Surface of the Pyrene Dimer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Fragme∩t: An Open-Source Framework for Multiscale Quantum Chemistry Based on Fragmentation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Montgomery GrayDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-2805
John M HerbertDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1663-2278

Funding

Quantum Chemistry Methods for Rational Drug DesignR43GM148095 · NIGMS · Q-CHEM, INC. · PI FENG, XINTIAN · 2023 to 2023
$248k
NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM148095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The titular domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO) approximation is the most widely used method for extending correlated wave function models to large molecular systems, yet its fidelity for intermolecular interaction energies in large supramolecular complexes has not been thoroughly vetted. Non-covalent interactions are sensitive to tails of the electron density and involve nonlocal dispersion that is discarded or approximated if the screening of pair natural orbitals (PNOs) is too aggressive. Meanwhile, the accuracy of the DLPNO approximation is known to deteriorate as molecular size increases. Here, we test the DLPNO approximation at the level of second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and coupled-cluster theory with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] for a variety of large supramolecular complexes. DLPNO-MP2 interaction energies are within 3% of canonical values for small dimers with ≲10 heavy atoms, but for larger systems, the DLPNO approximation is often quite poor unless the results are extrapolated to the canonical limit where the threshold for discarding PNOs is taken to zero. Counterpoise correction proves to be essential in reducing errors with respect to canonical results. For a sequence of nanoscale graphene dimers up to (C96H24)2, extrapolated DLPNO-MP2 interaction energies agree with canonical values to within 1%, independent of system size, provided that the basis set does not contain diffuse functions; these cause the DLPNO approximation to behave erratically, such that results cannot be extrapolated in a meaningful way. DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations are typically performed using looser PNO thresholds as compared to DLPNO-MP2, but this significantly impacts accuracy for large supramolecular complexes. Standard DLPNO-CCSD(T) settings afford errors of 2-6 kcal/mol for dimers involving coronene (C24H12) and circumcoronene (C54H18), even at the DLPNO-CCSD(T1) level.

Identifiers

PMID39105555
PMCPMC11305816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.