Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105274›Full record

Trial reportJournal of travel medicine2024

Assessing Wolbachia-mediated sterility for dengue control: emulation of a cluster-randomized target trial in Singapore.

Jue Tao Lim, Diyar Mailepessov, Chee-Seng Chong, Borame Dickens, Yee Ling Lai, Youming Ng, Lu Deng, Caleb Lee, Li Yun Tan, Grace Chain and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of travel medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. EliminatingInsects · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The inhibition mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jue Tao LimLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Rd, 308232, Singapore.
Diyar MailepessovEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Chee-Seng ChongEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Borame DickensSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, 117549, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1592-1745
Yee Ling LaiEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Youming NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Lu DengEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Caleb LeeEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Li Yun TanEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Grace ChainEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Soon Hoe HoEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Chia-Chen ChangEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Pei MaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, 117549, Singapore.
Somya BansalSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, 117549, Singapore.
Vernon LeeMinistry of Health, 16 College Road College of Medicine Building, 169854, Singapore.
Shuzhen SimEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Cheong Huat TanEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.
Lee Ching NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, 11 Biopolis Wy, 138667, Singapore.

Funding

National Environment AgencyNational Robotics ProgramSingapore's Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMatings between male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with wAlbB strain of Wolbachia and wildtype females yield non-viable eggs. We evaluated the efficacy of releasing wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti male mosquitoes to suppress dengue.

methodsWe specified the protocol of a two-arm cluster-randomized test-negative controlled trial (cRCT) and emulated it using a nationally representative test-negative/positive database of individuals reporting for febrile illness to any public hospital, general practitioner or polyclinic. We retrospectively built a cohort of individuals who reside in Wolbachia locations vs a comparator control group who do not reside in Wolbachia locations, using a nationally representative database of all individuals whom report for febrile illness and were tested for dengue at the Environmental Health Institute/hospital laboratories/commercial diagnostic laboratories, through general practitioner clinic, polyclinic or public/private hospital from epidemiological week (EW) 1 2019 to EW26 2022. We emulated a constrained randomization protocol used in cRCTs to balance dengue risk between intervention and control arms in the pre-intervention period. We used the inverse probability weighting approach to further balance the intervention and control groups using a battery of algorithmically selected sociodemographic, environmental and anthropogenic variables. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted to estimate the risk reduction of dengue given Wolbachia exposure.

resultsIntention-to-treat analyses revealed that, compared with controls, Wolbachia releases for 3, 6 and ≥12 months was associated to 47% (95% confidence interval: 25-69%), 44% (33-77%) and 61% (38-78%) protective efficacy against dengue, respectively. When exposed to ≥12 months of Wolbachia releases, protective efficacies ranged from 49% (13-72%) to 77% (60-94%) across years. The proportion of virologically confirmed dengue cases was lower overall in the intervention arm. Protective efficacies were found across all years, age and sex subgroups, with higher durations of Wolbachia exposure associated to greater risk reductions of dengue.

conclusionResults demonstrated that Wolbachia-mediated sterility can strengthen dengue control in tropical cities, where dengue burden is the greatest.

Indexed as

AedesDengueWolbachiaAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRetrospective StudiesSingaporeYoung AdultdengueEfficacyIITIIT-SITSITvector controlWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID39105274
PMCPMC11500660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.