ArticleMedical education2025
Reflecting on the Spectrum of Involvement: How do we involve patients as partners in education?
Article in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Complex intervention to improve empathy within maternity services: a mixed methods feasibility study with pilot evaluation.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Harnessing lived experience in health professions simulation-based education: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Article
- Embedding Patient and Public Involvement in Health Professions Education: Bridging Novelty and Normalisation.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Evidence-informed propositions for a whole-of-program assessment approach.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Article
- Exploring patient involvement in obstetrics and gynaecology medical education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Engaging Adolescents With Chronic Illness in Patient-Education: The Adolescent's Perception.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- How to … Co-design Education With Healthcare Consumers.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Reflecting on the Spectrum of Involvement: How do we involve patients as partners in education?Medical education · 2025Article
- Screen in between: How does livestreaming impact patient participation in education?Medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring the Integration of Patient Perspectives in Surgeon Education: Awareness, Engagement and Barriers to Implementation.Journal of CME · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Spectrum of Involvement describes six levels of active patient involvement in healthcare education. Only at the highest levels are patients described as 'equal partners'. Although this framework was never intended to be hierarchical, healthcare educators continue to strive towards aspirations for involving patients as 'equal partners' in education. However, we do not know what these partnerships mean for all stakeholders and how they can be achieved in practice. This study explores key stakeholders' understandings and experiences of patient partnerships in healthcare education.
methodsA qualitative case study design was adopted, underpinned by a social constructivist philosophical stance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 10) and educators (n = 10) from across a Medical School and a Healthcare School. Five focus groups were held with penultimate year students (n = 20) from across the two Schools. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree themes were generated: (i) equal partnerships are neither feasible nor desirable; (ii) partnership is about being and feeling valued; and (iii) valuing patients as partners. Patients did not always desire the highest levels of involvement, as 'equal partners' in education. All stakeholders agreed that partnership need not be synonymous with equality. Instead, they contended that true partnerships were about valuing patients for their contributions at any level of involvement. Remuneration, student feedback, training and providing institutional access were viewed as important methods of valuing patients as partners.
conclusionPatients, educators and students questioned the notion that patient partnerships are only achievable at the highest levels of involvement. Critical application of the Spectrum of Involvement in future research and education is encouraged. This study addresses a gap in the literature, providing tangible approaches to valuing patients as partners that are endorsed by all stakeholders. We propose a model for achieving valued patient partnerships in educational practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.