Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105258›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Unveiling the nexus! Understanding knowledge issues, animal contact patterns and interaction of health care providers in the context of monkeypox and COVID-19 during monkeypox outbreak 2022.

Samar A Amer, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Sarya Swed, Omar A Albeladi, Alex Stéphane Ndjip Ndjock, Al Zahraa M Soliman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samar A AmerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-6372
Hossam Tharwat AliQena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-5911
Sarya SwedFaculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-9983-2020
Omar A AlbeladiPublic Health Departments, King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Medical City, El Madinah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-1783
Alex Stéphane Ndjip NdjockDepartment of Public Health, Edea Health District, Edea, Cameroon.
Al Zahraa M SolimanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-6017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA monkeypox (MPOX) outbreak occurred in May 2022. On June 3, 2022, the WHO Blueprint organized a consultation on MPOX research knowledge gaps and priority research questions because the engagement of health care providers (HCPs) in providing accurate information and the public's motivation to adapt protective behaviour were crucial. Thus, we conducted this study to explore the knowledge issues, animal patterns, and interactions of HCPs in the context of MPOX and COVID-19 during the MPOX outbreak.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey among 816 HCPs working in governmental health facilities from many countries, mainly Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Cameroon, in September 2022.

resultsFour hundred and sixty (56.37%) were aged between 18 and less than 35 years old. About 34.44% were physicians, while only 37.25% worked on the frontlines with patients. 37.99% and 5.88% received vaccinations against chickenpox and MPOX, respectively. In the meantime, 55.39% had taken courses or training programmes regarding COVID-19. Regarding knowledge-seeking behaviours (KSBs) about COVID-19, 38.73% were through passive attention, while only 28.8% got their information through active search. Most of the participants (56.86%) had a moderate level of knowledge regarding COVID-19. Only 8.82% had courses or training programmes regarding MPOX. Regarding KSB about MPOX, 50.86% were obtained through passive attention, while only 18.01% and 23.04% got their information through active and passive search, respectively. Most of the participants (57.60%) had a poor level of knowledge regarding MPOX. The regression analysis of the MPOX knowledge score revealed that individuals working on the frontlines with patients and those who had training programmes or courses were shown to have a higher score by 1.25 and 3.18 points, respectively.

conclusionsThe studied HCPs had poorer knowledge about the MPOX virus than they did about the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Training programmes and education courses had an impact on their knowledge.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelMpox, MonkeypoxSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19health belief modelsHealth care providersinformation-seeking behaviourmonkeypox

Identifiers

PMID39105258
PMCPMC11305047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.