ReviewSoft matter2024
Rethinking nuclear shaping: insights from the nuclear drop model.
Review in Soft matter, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanobiology in confined cell migration.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Nuclear Wrinkles Result From Geometric Adaptations to Cellular and Nuclear Morphological Changes in Epithelial Cells.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026Article
- Hyperwrinkling of the nuclear lamina is associated with attenuated mechanosensitivity in giant nucleated cancer cells.Science advances · 2026Article
- Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- Evidence for Drop-Like Nuclear Deformation in Sheared Endothelial Monolayers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Nuclei sense complex tissue shape and direct intestinal stem cell fate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Confinement by Liquid-Liquid Interface Replicates In Vivo Neutrophil Deformations and Elicits Bleb-Based Migration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in the nuclear shape caused by cellular shape changes are generally assumed to reflect an elastic deformation from a spherical nuclear shape. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the nuclear lamina, which forms the outer nuclear surface together with the nuclear envelope, possesses more area than that of a sphere of the same volume. This excess area manifests as folds/wrinkles in the nuclear surface in rounded cells and allows facile nuclear flattening during cell spreading without any changes in nuclear volume or surface area. When the lamina becomes smooth and taut, it is inextensible, and supports a surface tension. At this point, it is possible to mathematically calculate the limiting nuclear shape purely based on geometric considerations. In this paper, we provide a commentary on the "nuclear drop model" which seeks to integrate the above features. We outline its testable physical properties and explore its biological implications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.