Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105187›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2024

The Effect of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream Combined with or Without Remimazolam on VAS and APAIS Anxiety Score in Patient Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia.

Shuqing Liang, Shuai Li, Zhao Zhong, Qichen Luo, Cai Nie, Donghua Hu, Yalan Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuqing LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Shuai LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Zhao ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Qichen LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5810-5495
Cai NieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Donghua HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Yalan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3495-4721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate patients' expectative pain of spinal anesthesia puncture and anxiety pre-anesthesia, and to examine the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream and remimazolam prior to spinal anesthesia puncture on pain relief and anxiety release. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were divided into control, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam groups. A questionnaire consisting of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and patient's concerns and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient's anxiety and pain. The primary outcomes were differences in VAS and anxiety scores. Patient's spinal anesthesia-related concerns, advent events and hemodynamic index were also recorded. Results: The expected spinal anesthesia puncture pain was 5.34±0.27 and anxiety scores before spinal anesthesia was 10.88 ± 0.64. A statistically significant positive correlation of 31.3% was detected between VAS and APAIS scores (r = 0.313; P=0.003). The VAS score at the time of puncture decreased by 29.7% (3.78±0.40, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 29.2% (3.75±0.39, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam group compared with the expected VAS score. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream combined with or without remimazolam reduced the percentage of moderate pain (21.4% and 31.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.0001) and increased mild pain (60.7% vs 59.4% vs 22.7%, P=0.03). Anxiety score in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was reduced by 2.84 (8.04±0.76 vs 10.88 ± 0.46, P=0.05) when compared with pre-anesthesia. Concerns about postoperative pain (P=0.03) and fear of the needle or intervention (P=0.000) both decreased post-anesthesia among groups. Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia experienced a moderate level of preoperative anxiety. The patient's pain expectation from the spinal anesthesia puncture was moderate, which was higher than the actual pain. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream with or without remimazolam sedative before spinal anesthesia puncture reduced the patient's pain and anxiety scores after surgery.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalAnxietyLidocaineAdultAnesthetics, LocalBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPrilocaineAnesthetics, LocalBenzodiazepinesLidocainePrilocaineremimazolamAPAISlidocaine-prilocainepreoperative anxietyremimazolamspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39105187
PMCPMC11299647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.