ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Papillary Muscle Delayed Hyperenhancement: Prevalence and Clinical Implications in a Large Population With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Papillary Muscle Scarring in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Improved and Automated Detection of Papillary Muscle Infarction Using Joint Bright- and Black-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Papillary muscle-delayed hyperenhancement (papHE) at cardiac magnetic resonance indicates fibrotic or infiltrative processes. Contrary to myocardial HE, the prevalence and prognostic implications of papHE in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy are unclear. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of papHE and describe its association with adverse clinical outcomes. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 528 patients who underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, sudden cardiac death, life-threatening arrhythmia, and hospitalization for heart failure. Patients were allocated into 4 categories: the first without papHE and without myocardial HE, the second with papHE, the third with myocardial HE, and the fourth with papHE and myocardial HE. The hazards of the primary outcomes for each category were compared using multivariable Cox regression. Results: papHE was present in 131 patients (25%). The median follow-up duration was 6.1 years (IQR: 3.7-9.7 years). Isolated papHE and isolated myocardial HE were not significantly associated with any of the prespecified outcomes. Patients who had both myocardial HE and papHE were at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.26-4.30), sudden cardiac death (HR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.59-8.94), life-threatening arrhythmia (HR: 3.94, 95% CI: 1.34-11.58), and hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.30-6.80). Conclusions: The combined presence of myocardial and papHE was independently associated with adverse outcomes. Future studies should investigate if the incorporation of papHE and myocardial HE may improve clinical decision-making strategies to select dilated cardiomyopathy patients who would benefit the most from ICD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.