Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105104›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2024

From bed to bench and back again: Challenges facing deployment of intracranial pressure data analysis in clinical environments.

Laura Moss, Martin Shaw, Ian Piper, Christopher Hawthorne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evolving concepts in intracranial pressure monitoring - from traditional monitoring to precision medicine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura MossDept. of Clinical Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Martin ShawDept. of Clinical Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ian PiperCollege of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Christopher HawthorneDept. of Neuroanaesthesia, Institute of Neurological Sciences, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous complex physiological models derived from intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring data have been developed. More recently, techniques such as machine learning are being used to develop increasingly sophisticated models to aid in clinical decision-making tasks such as diagnosis and prediction. Whilst their potential clinical impact may be significant, few models based on ICP data are routinely available at a patient's bedside. Further, the ability to refine models using ongoing patient data collection is rare. In this paper we identify and discuss the challenges faced when converting insight from ICP data analysis into deployable tools at the patient bedside. Research question: To provide an overview of challenges facing implementation of sophisticated ICP models and analyses at the patient bedside. Material and methods: A narrative review of the barriers facing implementation of sophisticated ICP models and analyses at the patient bedside in a neurocritical care unit combined with a descriptive case study (the CHART-ADAPT project) on the topic. Results: Key barriers found were technical, analytical, and integrity related. Examples included: lack of interoperability of medical devices for data collection and/or model deployment; inadequate infrastructure, hindering analysis of large volumes of high frequency patient data; a lack of clinical confidence in a model; and ethical, trust, security and patient confidentiality considerations governing the secondary use of patient data. Discussion and conclusion: To realise the benefits of ICP data analysis, the results need to be promptly delivered and meaningfully communicated. Multiple barriers to implementation remain and solutions which address real-world challenges are required.

Indexed as

Big dataIntracranial pressureMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39105104
PMCPMC11298855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.