ArticleBrain & spine2024
A clinical evaluation of variation in paediatric intracranial pressure waveforms.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is commonly used in investigating the aetiology of chronic paediatric neurological conditions. A series of high-amplitude spikes has been observed in overnight ICP recordings of some children, many of whom have hydrocephalus or craniosynostosis. Research question: This clinical evaluation aimed to define the spike pattern, describe the patient group in which it is most likely to occur, and conduct high-resolution waveform analysis. Material and methods: ICP waveforms from 40 patients aged 0-5 years (inclusive), recorded between 2017 and 2021 at the Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, were retrospectively analysed. The pattern was defined through visual inspection of regions of interest by two reviewers. Patients were stratified using demographic and clinical data. R software was used to perform regression and high-resolution waveform analyses. Results: The spike pattern was defined as the presence of 2 consecutive spikes with an amplitude of at least 8 mmHg, with a gap of at least 30 min between spikes. In the adjusted Poisson regression, age was significantly associated with the number of spikes (IRR 0.8, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.92, p-value 0.001). Discussion and conclusion: Younger age was significantly associated with an increased number of spikes in this cohort. Investigation of clinical consequences of the spikes is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.