Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105100›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Identification of characteristic flavor quality of ceramic-pot sealed meat after reheating based on HS-GC-IMS, bionic sensory combined chemometrics.

Chunyuan Ping, Yuanqi Liu, Jicai Bi, Xuemei Cai, Xiang Li, Mingfeng Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunyuan PingCulinary Science Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China.
Yuanqi LiuCulinary Science Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China.
Jicai BiSchool of Food Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan 453003, China.
Xuemei CaiCulinary Science Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China.
Xiang LiCulinary Science Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China.
Mingfeng QiaoCulinary Science Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of microwave reheating (MR), boil reheating (BR), and steam reheating (SR) on the flavor profile of Ceramic-Pot Sealed Meat (CPSM). Electronic nose and tongue revealed that the microwaving was superior in preserving the original olfactory and gustatory profiles of CPSM compared to the other methods. Headspace- Gas chromatography- ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) detected 48 compounds, encompassing 15 alcohols, 11 aldehydes, 9 ketones, 7 esters, 2 alkenes, and 2 others, 1 acid. Spectral and clustering analysis revealed a significant rise in the content of Warmed-over flavor compounds after boil reheating, culminating in pronounced flavor distortion and a decline in sensory scores. Relative odor activity value (ROAV) and chemometrics identified nine substances as the principal flavor compounds responsible to flavor distortion. In conclusion, all reheating methods induce changes in the original flavor characteristics profiles of CPSM. However, microwave reheating offers superior preservation of the flavor characteristics of CPSM.

Indexed as

Bionic sensoryCeramic-pot sealed meatHS-GC-IMSPrepared dishesReheating methods

Identifiers

PMID39105100
PMCPMC11298606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.