Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39105058›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Long-term efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of apitegromab in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: results from the 36-month TOPAZ study.

Thomas O Crawford, John W Day, Darryl C De Vivo, Jena M Krueger, Eugenio Mercuri, Andres Nascimento, Amy Pasternak, Elena Stacy Mazzone, Tina Duong, Guochen Song and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03921528 (Phase 2 Active Treatment Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SRK-015 in Patients With Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03921528 phase2completednot on this map

Phase 2 Active Treatment Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SRK-015 in Patients With Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (TOPAZ)

TypeinterventionalSponsorScholar Rock, Inc.Ran2019 to 2024Enrolled58ConditionsSpinal Muscular Atrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3, Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2, SMAArmsSRK-015
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Spinal muscular atrophy: Biology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic advances.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thomas O CrawfordJohns Hopkins Medical, Baltimore, MD, United States.
John W DayStanford Neuroscience Health Center, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Darryl C De VivoDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jena M KruegerHelen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.
Eugenio MercuriCentro Clinico NeMO, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andres NascimentoNeuromuscular Unit, Department of Neurology, Applied Research in Neuromuscular Diseases, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu (CIBERER), Barcelona, ISCIII, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Amy PasternakDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Elena Stacy MazzoneCentro Clinico NeMO, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Tina DuongStanford Neuroscience Health Center, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Guochen SongScholar Rock, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jing L MarantzScholar Rock, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Scott BaverScholar Rock, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Dongzi YuScholar Rock, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Lan LiuScholar Rock, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Basil T DarrasDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: At 12 months in the phase 2 TOPAZ study, treatment with apitegromab was associated with both an improved motor function in patients with Type 2 or 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and with a favorable safety profile. This manuscript reports the extended efficacy and safety in the nonambulatory group of the TOPAZ study at 36 months. Methods: Patients who completed the primary study (NCT03921528) could enroll in an open-label extension, during which patients received apitegromab 20 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks. Patients were assessed periodically via the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), World Health Organization (WHO) motor development milestones, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) Daily Activities and Mobility domains, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue questionnaire. Results: Of the 58 patients enrolled in TOPAZ, 35 were nonambulatory (mean age 7.3 years). The mean change at 36 months in HFMSE score from baseline was +4.0 (standard deviation [SD]: 7.54), and + 2.4 (3.24) for RULM score (excluding Conclusion: The benefit of apitegromab treatment observed at 12 months was sustained at 36 months with no new safety findings.

Indexed as

apitegromabcaregiver-reported outcomesefficacylong-termmotor functionsafetyspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID39105058
PMCPMC11299114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.