ArticleToxicology research2024
Assessment of B-type natriuretic peptide as an early predictor of mortality in acutely poisoned patients with cardiotoxicities.
Article in Toxicology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Development of a risk-prediction nomogram for in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events in acute cardiotoxic agents poisoning.Toxicology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiotoxicity is a major toxic effect induced by several types of drugs. An electrocardiogram is done routinely in cardiovascular drug exposures. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is the usual biomarker for diagnosing myocardial injury. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a well-established predictor of disease state in suspected heart failure. Aim: The study aimed to assess BNP's role as an early predictor of mortality compared with cTnI and ECG changes in acutely poisoned patients with cardiotoxicities. Methodology: This study enrolled 70 patients with acute cardiotoxicity by drugs and toxins known to cause cardiac injury admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center (TUPCC). Collected data included socio-demographic data, toxicological history, vital signs, ECG changes, Poison Severity Score (PSS), BNP, and cTnI serum levels. Result: Patients were classified as survivors and non-survivors. Significantly more delay time was recorded in non-survivors. Moreover, vital signs were significantly abnormal in non-survivors. There was no statistical significance regarding the initial ECG abnormalities between survivors and non-survivors. BNP and cTnI levels were significantly higher among non-survivors. For mortality prediction, BNP had good predictive power (AUC = 0.841) with 100% sensitivity and 79.7% specificity while cTnI had an acceptable predictive power (AUC = 0.786), with 83.3% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity with insignificant difference between both biomarkers. Conclusion: BNP and cTnI levels can predict mortality in acute cardiotoxicity compared to ECG which has no statistically significant prediction. BNP has a higher discriminatory power than cTnI for the prediction of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.