ArticleCureus2024
Chiari Malformation Type I With Concurrent Bilateral Optic Disc Drusen: Is Follow-up Necessary?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudopapilledema caused by optic disc drusen (ODD) mimics the appearance of papilledema and usually presents as a diagnostic challenge. A young boy with known Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) was referred to the pediatric ophthalmology clinic for eye assessment to exclude papilledema due to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Despite the ophthalmic examination revealing bilateral optic disc elevation, multimodal imaging techniques such as fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and B-scan ultrasonography are recommended to confirm the distinction between bilateral ODD causing pseudopapilledema and papilledema secondary to elevated ICP. Accidental coexistent papilledema mimickers like ODD need to be considered in patients with CM-1 before making a diagnosis of papilledema to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. There was no evidence that the presence of ODD excludes the possibility of future optic nerve head changes due to elevated ICP. The multidisciplinary consensus decided on annual ophthalmology follow-ups using multimodal imaging to detect any subtle optic nerve head changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.