ArticleCureus2024
Successful Rhinophyma Treatment Utilizing the Versajet II Hydrosurgery System: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Nasal Splitting Technique for Dual Rhinoplasty and Rhinophyma Management: A Case Report and Literature Review.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Combination of rhinoshave and fractional ablative COJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhinophyma, characterized by hypertrophy of sebaceous glands, often necessitates surgical intervention. This is the second case report of the off-label use of the Versajet II Hydrosurgery System (VJHS) (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) in the United States for the treatment of rhinophyma and the first systematic review of the literature, emphasizing its efficacy and safety for this indication. A surgical debulking and resurfacing was performed on a patient with rhinophyma. The patient underwent general anesthesia along with bilateral infraorbital blocks and local infiltration of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine. The VJHS was utilized for progressive debulking followed by debridement using sharp instruments until the desired nasal form and contour were achieved. Hemostasis was obtained through monopolar electrocautery and topical hemostatic agents. The patient exhibited excellent nasal shape and healing following VJHS debulking and without perioperative complications, suggesting both the effectiveness and safety of the VJHS in rhinophyma treatment. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed Central database. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, employing inclusion and exclusion criteria, were utilized to narrow down results to include original studies discussing rhinophyma surgical debridement with the VJHS. Six articles were included in the review for results analysis. This case report aligns with findings from international literature, emphasizing the versatility of the VJHS in rhinophyma treatment. Notably, this report marks the second documented off-label use of the VJHS in the United States for rhinophyma. The success of this case reinforces the potential of the VJHS in treating rhinophyma. This innovative approach yielded promising outcomes in several international reports. Further research is warranted to establish a standardized protocol to validate the long-term benefits of this technology applied to rhinophyma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.