ArticleERJ open research2024
Estimates of primary ciliary dyskinesia prevalence: a scoping review.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia.The European respiratory journal · 2025Guideline
- Pulmonary exacerbations in primary ciliary dyskinesia.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Structural lung assessment in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia: evaluation with the SPEC scoring system.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exome sequencing-based identification ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia-Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Clinical development of therapeutic mRNA applications.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- An incomplete Kartagener syndrome presenting with recurrent exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Eosinophilic Pneumonia Triggered byMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Ciliary Function, Antigen Stasis and Asthma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare multisystem genetic disease caused by dysfunctional motile cilia. Despite PCD being the second most common inherited airway disease after cystic fibrosis, PCD continues to be under-recognised globally owing to nonspecific clinical features and the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test. Commonly repeated prevalence estimates range from one in 10 000 to one in 20 000, based on regional epidemiological studies with known limitations. The purpose of this scoping review was to appraise the PCD literature, to determine the best available global PCD prevalence estimate and to inform the reader about the potential unmet health service needs in PCD. The primary objective of the present study was to systematically review the literature about PCD prevalence estimates. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology. Included studies estimated PCD prevalence and used cohort, clinical or genomic data. Case reports, conference abstracts, review articles, animal studies or non-English articles were excluded. Results: A literature review identified 3484 unique abstracts; 34 underwent full-text review and eight met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Seven articles were based on epidemiological studies of specific geographical regions and provided prevalence estimates that ranged from approximately one to 44.1 in 100 000. Only one study estimated global prevalence, using two large genomic databases, and calculated it to be ∼13.2 in 100 000 (based on pathogenic variants in 29 disease-causing genes). Conclusions: A population-based genomic approach for estimating global prevalence has found that PCD is much more prevalent than previously cited in the literature. This highlights the potential unmet health service needs of people living with PCD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.