Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

The fusion of vegetation indices increases the accuracy of cotton leaf area prediction.

Xianglong Fan, Pan Gao, Mengli Zhang, Hao Cang, Lifu Zhang, Ze Zhang, Jin Wang, Xin Lv, Qiang Zhang, Lulu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xianglong FanKey Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Pan GaoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Mengli ZhangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Hao CangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Lifu ZhangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ze ZhangKey Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Jin WangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin LvKey Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Qiang ZhangKey Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Lulu MaKey Laboratory of Oasis Ecological Agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid and accurate estimation of leaf area index (LAI) is of great significance for the precision agriculture because LAI is an important parameter to evaluate crop canopy structure and growth status. Methods: In this study, 20 vegetation indices were constructed by using cotton canopy spectra. Then, cotton LAI estimation models were constructed based on multiple machine learning (ML) methods extreme learning machine (ELM), random forest (RF), back propagation (BP), multivariable linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM)], and the optimal modeling strategy (RF) was selected. Finally, the vegetation indices with a high correlation with LAI were fused to construct the VI-fusion RF model, to explore the potential of multi-vegetation index fusion in the estimation of cotton LAI. Results: The RF model had the highest estimation accuracy among the LAI estimation models, and the estimation accuracy of models constructed by fusing multiple VIs was higher than that of models constructed based on single VIs. Among the multi-VI fusion models, the RF model constructed based on the fusion of seven vegetation indices (MNDSI, SRI, GRVI, REP, CIred-edge, MSR, and NVI) had the highest estimation accuracy, with coefficient of determination (R2), rootmean square error (RMSE), normalized rootmean square error (NRMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.90, 0.50, 0.14, and 0.26, respectively. Discussion: Appropriate fusion of vegetation indices can include more spectral features in modeling and significantly improve the cotton LAI estimation accuracy. This study will provide a technical reference for improving the cotton LAI estimation accuracy, and the proposed method has great potential for crop growth monitoring applications.

Indexed as

canopy spectrumfusion of vegetation indicesLAImachine learningmonitoring

Identifiers

PMID39104844
PMCPMC11298913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.