Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104831›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2024

The potential effect of romosozumab on perioperative management for instrumentation surgery.

Koji Ishikawa, Soji Tani, Tomoaki Toyone, Koki Tsuchiya, Tomoko Towatari, Yusuke Oshita, Ryo Yamamura, Kazuki Wada, Takashi Nagai, Toshiyuki Shirahata and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of anti-osteoporosis medication on refracture prevention following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Anabolic treatment in geriatric patients with osteoporosis].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Koji IshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-5662
Soji TaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Tomoaki ToyoneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Koki TsuchiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Tomoko TowatariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Yusuke OshitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Ryo YamamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Kazuki WadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Takashi NagaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Toshiyuki ShirahataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Katsunori InagakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Kudo YoshifumiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine Showa University Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Age-related changes in bone health increase the risk for complications in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Osteoporosis is a key therapeutic target that needs to be addressed to ensure successful instrumentation surgery. The effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in orthopedic surgery, particularly the new drug romosozumab, is still unknown. We aim to evaluate the effect of 3-month romosozumab treatment on biomechanical parameters related to spinal instrumentation surgery, using the Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT)-based Finite Element Method (FEM). Methods: This open-labeled, prospective study included 81 patients aged 60 to 90 years, who met the osteoporosis criteria and were scheduled for either romosozumab or eldecalcitol treatment. Patients were assessed using blood samples, dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and QCT. Biomechanical parameters were evaluated using FEM at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints were biomechanical parameters at 3 months, while secondary endpoints included changes in regional volumetric bone mineral density around the pedicle (P-vBMD) and vertebral body (V-vBMD). Results: Romosozumab treatment led to significant gains in P-vBMD, and V-vBMD compared to eldecalcitol at 3 months. Notably, the romosozumab group showed greater improvements in all biomechanical parameters estimated by FEM at 3 months compared to the eldecalcitol group. Conclusion: Romosozumab significantly increased the regional vBMD as well as biomechanical parameters, potentially offering clinical benefits in reducing post-operative complications in patients with osteoporosis undergoing orthopedic instrumentation surgery. This study highlights the novel advantages of romosozumab treatment and advocates further research on its effectiveness in perioperative management.

Indexed as

agingbiomechanicsimagingosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID39104831
PMCPMC11299907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.