Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104695›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Predicting the temporal-dynamic trajectories of cortical neuronal responses in non-human primates based on deep spiking neural network.

Jie Zhang, Liwei Huang, Zhengyu Ma, Huihui Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie Zhang *The Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055 China.
Liwei Huang *Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518000 China.
Zhengyu MaPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518000 China.
Huihui ZhouThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055 China.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-1943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are commonly used as computational models for the primate ventral stream, while deep spiking neural networks (SNNs) incorporated with both the temporal and spatial spiking information still lack investigation. We compared performances of SNN and CNN in prediction of visual responses to the naturalistic stimuli in area V4, inferior temporal (IT), and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). The accuracies based on SNN were significantly higher than that of CNN in prediction of temporal-dynamic trajectory and averaged firing rate of visual response in V4 and IT. The temporal dynamics were captured by SNN for neurons with diverse temporal profiles and category selectivities, and most sensitively captured around the time of peak responses for each brain region. Consistently, SNN activities showed significantly stronger correlations with IT, V4 and OFC responses. In SNN, correlations with neural activities were stronger for later time-step features than early time-step features. The temporal-dynamic prediction was also significantly improved by considering preceding neural activities during the prediction. Thus, our study demonstrated SNN as a powerful temporal-dynamic model for cortical responses to complex naturalistic stimuli.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkNeural predictionSpiking neural networkTemporal dynamicsVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID39104695
PMCPMC11297849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.