Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104683›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Cognitive workload estimation using physiological measures: a review.

Debashis Das Chakladar, Partha Pratim Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Simultaneous Mental Fatigue and Mental Workload Assessment With Wearable High-Density Diffuse Optical Tomography.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Debashis Das ChakladarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.
Partha Pratim RoyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-5254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating cognitive workload levels is an emerging research topic in the cognitive neuroscience domain, as participants' performance is highly influenced by cognitive overload or underload results. Different physiological measures such as Electroencephalography (EEG), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional near-infrared spectroscopy, respiratory activity, and eye activity are efficiently used to estimate workload levels with the help of machine learning or deep learning techniques. Some reviews focus only on EEG-based workload estimation using machine learning classifiers or multimodal fusion of different physiological measures for workload estimation. However, a detailed analysis of all physiological measures for estimating cognitive workload levels still needs to be discovered. Thus, this survey highlights the in-depth analysis of all the physiological measures for assessing cognitive workload. This survey emphasizes the basics of cognitive workload, open-access datasets, the experimental paradigm of cognitive tasks, and different measures for estimating workload levels. Lastly, we emphasize the significant findings from this review and identify the open challenges. In addition, we also specify future scopes for researchers to overcome those challenges.

Indexed as

Cognitive workloadConvolutional neural networkElectroencephalographyLong short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID39104683
PMCPMC11297869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.