ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
A delayed matching task-based study on action sequence of motor imagery.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The way people imagine greatly affects performance of brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motion imagery (MI). Action sequence is a basic unit of imitation, learning, and memory for motor behavior. Whether it influences the MI-BCI is unknown, and how to manifest this influence is difficult since the MI is a spontaneous brain activity. To investigate the influence of the action sequence, this study proposes a novel paradigm named action sequences observing and delayed matching task to use images and videos to guide people to observe, match and reinforce the memory of sequence. Seven subjects' ERPs and MI performance are analyzed under four different levels of complexities or orders of the sequence. Results demonstrated that the action sequence in terms of complexity and sequence order significantly affects the MI. The complex action in positive order obtains stronger ERD/ERS and more pronounced MI feature distributions, and yields an MI classification accuracy that is 12.3% higher than complex action in negative order (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.