Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104645›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2024

Healthcare professionals' views on psychological support for children and families affected by skin conditions in the UK: A qualitative study.

Olivia Hughes, Katherine H Shelton, Andrew R Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivia HughesSchool of Psychology Cardiff University Cardiff Wales UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9587-9430
Katherine H SheltonSchool of Psychology Cardiff University Cardiff Wales UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-5291
Andrew R ThompsonDoctoral Programme in Clinical Psychology Cardiff & Vale University Health Board & School of Psychology Cardiff University Cardiff Wales UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-7222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin conditions can have a psychological impact on a child and their caregivers, however, support is not equally distributed between geographical regions in the United Kingdom (UK). Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the experience of National Health Service (NHS) healthcare professionals (HCPs) of addressing the psychological needs of children with skin conditions and their families, and gain expert opinion as to how services need to further develop. Design: HCPs were recruited to a qualitative study with an advert posted on social media. Methods: Fifteen HCPs took part in interviews, including dermatologists ( Results: Thematic analysis revealed children often presented with anxiety, depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation. The impact on caregivers was equally profound. There were differences in service provision across the UK and all HCPs recognised the urgent need for psychological support to be integrated into standard care. Participants described how a range of interventions are typically required including cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and systemic approaches, as well as mindfulness/third-wave approaches. Barriers to the delivery of psychological services were associated with a lack of funding and training opportunities for core and specialist staff alike. However, in some instances, participants had overcome these challenges to be able to deliver unique services. Conclusions: There exist several barriers to providing paediatric psychological interventions, and many locations across the UK remain vulnerable as a result of continuing lack of national guidelines for the provision of psychological services.

Identifiers

PMID39104645
PMCPMC11297452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.