Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104573›Full record

ReviewBJR open2024

"Under the hood": artificial intelligence in personalized radiotherapy.

Chiara Gianoli, Elisabetta De Bernardi, Katia Parodi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara GianoliDepartment of Experimental Physics - Medical Physics, Faculty for Physics of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, München, 80539, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-7448
Elisabetta De BernardiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milano, 20126, Italy.
Katia ParodiDepartment of Experimental Physics - Medical Physics, Faculty for Physics of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, München, 80539, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents and discusses the ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) tools currently intervene, or could potentially intervene in the future, to enhance the diverse tasks involved in the radiotherapy workflow. The radiotherapy framework is presented on 2 different levels for the personalization of the treatment, distinct in tasks and methodologies. The first level is the clinically well-established anatomy-based workflow, known as adaptive radiation therapy. The second level is referred to as biology-driven workflow, explored in the research literature and recently appearing in some preliminary clinical trials for personalized radiation treatments. A 2-fold role for AI is defined according to these 2 different levels. In the anatomy-based workflow, the role of AI is to streamline and improve the tasks in terms of time and variability reductions compared to conventional methodologies. The biology-driven workflow instead fully relies on AI, which introduces decision-making tools opening uncharted frontiers that were in the past deemed challenging to explore. These methodologies are referred to as radiomics and dosiomics, handling imaging and dosimetric information, or multiomics, when complemented by clinical and biological parameters (ie, biomarkers). The review explicitly highlights the methodologies that are currently incorporated into clinical practice or still in research, with the aim of presenting the AI's growing role in personalized radiotherapy.

Indexed as

adaptive radiation therapyartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningpersonalized radiation treatmentradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39104573
PMCPMC11299549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.