Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104557›Full record

ArticleReviews in fish biology and fisheries2024

Diet and habitat as determinants of intestine length in fishes.

Maria J Duque-Correa, Kendall D Clements, Carlo Meloro, Fabrizia Ronco, Anna Boila, Adrian Indermaur, Walter Salzburger, Marcus Clauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amphibian Intestine Allometry.Journal of morphology · 2026
    Article
  7. Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Habitat-specific temporal variation in the pace of fish diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria J Duque-CorreaClinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse, 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-2228
Kendall D ClementsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag, 92019 Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8512-5977
Carlo MeloroResearch Center in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0175-1706
Fabrizia RoncoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-8108
Anna BoilaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-6657-2474
Adrian IndermaurDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3048-8911
Walter SalzburgerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-1674
Marcus ClaussClinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse, 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-6207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish biologists have long assumed a link between intestinal length and diet, and relative gut length or Zihler's index are often used to classify species into trophic groups. This has been done for specific fish taxa or specific ecosystems, but not for a global fish dataset. Here, we assess these relationships across a dataset of 468 fish species (254 marine, 191 freshwater, and 23 that occupy both habitats) in relation to body mass and fish length. Herbivores had significantly relatively stouter bodies and longer intestines than omni- and faunivores. Among faunivores, corallivores had longer intestines than invertivores, with piscivores having the shortest. There were no detectable differences between herbivore groups, possibly due to insufficient understanding of herbivorous fish diets. We propose that reasons for long intestines in fish include (i) difficult-to-digest items that require a symbiotic microbiome, and (ii) the dilution of easily digestible compounds with indigestible material (e.g., sand, wood, exoskeleton). Intestinal indices differed significantly between dietary groups, but there was substantial group overlap. Counter-intuitively, in the largest dataset, marine species had significantly shorter intestines than freshwater fish. These results put fish together with mammals as vertebrate taxa with clear convergence in intestine length in association with trophic level, in contrast to reptiles and birds, even if the peculiar feeding ecology of herbivorous fish is probably more varied than that of mammalian herbivores. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11160-024-09853-3.

Indexed as

AnatomyDigestionDilutionEcomorphologyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID39104557
PMCPMC11297901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.