Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Machine learning algorithms predict canine structural epilepsy with high accuracy.

Thomas Flegel, Anja Neumann, Anna-Lena Holst, Olivia Kretzschmann, Shenja Loderstedt, Carina Tästensen, Sarah Gutmann, Josephine Dietzel, Lisa Franziska Becker, Theresa Kalliwoda and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thomas Flegel *Department for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Anja Neumann *Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna-Lena HolstDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Olivia KretzschmannDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Shenja LoderstedtDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Carina TästensenDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Sarah GutmannDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Josephine DietzelDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Lisa Franziska BeckerDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Theresa KalliwodaDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Vivian WeißDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Madlene KowarikDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Irene Christine BöttcherDepartment for Small Animals, Veterinary Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian MartinCenter for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical reasoning in veterinary medicine is often based on clinicians' personal experience in combination with information derived from publications describing cohorts of patients. Studies on the use of scientific methods for patient individual decision making are largely lacking. This applies to the prediction of the individual underlying pathology in seizuring dogs as well. The aim of this study was to apply machine learning to the prediction of the risk of structural epilepsy in dogs with seizures. Materials and methods: Dogs with a history of seizures were retrospectively as well as prospectively included. Data about clinical history, neurological examination, diagnostic tests performed as well as the final diagnosis were collected. For data analysis, the Bayesian Network and Random Forest algorithms were used. A total of 33 features for Random Forest and 17 for Bayesian Network were available for analysis. The following four feature selection methods were applied to select features for further analysis: Permutation Importance, Forward Selection, Random Selection and Expert Opinion. The two algorithms Bayesian Network and Random Forest were trained to predict structural epilepsy using the selected features. Results: A total of 328 dogs of 119 different breeds were identified retrospectively between January 2017 and June 2021, of which 33.2% were diagnosed with structural epilepsy. An overall of 89,848 models were trained. The Bayesian Network in combination with the Random feature selection performed best. It was able to predict structural epilepsy with an accuracy of 0.969 (sensitivity: 0.857, specificity: 1.000) among all dogs with seizures using the following features: age at first seizure, cluster seizures, seizure in last 24 h, seizure in last 6 month, and seizure in last year. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms such as Bayesian Networks and Random Forests identify dogs with structural epilepsy with a high sensitivity and specificity. This information could provide some guidance to clinicians and pet owners in their clinical decision-making process.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBayesian Networkdogfeature selectionRandom Forestseizures

Identifiers

PMID39104548
PMCPMC11298453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.