ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023
BUILDING A DOSE TOXO-EQUIVALENCE MODEL FROM A BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED CLINICAL TRIALS.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BUILDING A DOSE TOXO-EQUIVALENCE MODEL FROM A BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED CLINICAL TRIALS.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical practice medications are often interchanged in treatment protocols when a patient negatively reacts to their first line of therapy. Although switching between medications is common, clinicians often lack structured guidance when choosing the initial dose and frequency of a new medication, given the former with respect to risk of adverse events. In this paper we propose to establish this dose toxo-equivalence relationship using published clinical trial results with one or both drugs of interest via a Bayesian meta-analysis model that accounts for both within- and between-study variances. With the posterior parameter samples from this model, we compute median and 95% credible intervals for equivalent dose pairs of the two drugs that are predicted to produce equal rates of an adverse outcome, relying solely on study-level information. Via extensive simulations, we show that this approach approximates well the true dose toxo-equivalence relationship, considering different study designs, levels of between-study variance, and the inclusion/exclusion of nonconfounder/nonmodifier subject-level covariates in addition to study-level covariates. We compare the performance of this study-level meta-analysis estimate to the equivalent individual patient data meta-analysis model and find comparable bias and minimal efficiency loss in the study-level coefficients used in the dose toxo-equivalence relationship. Finally, we present the findings of our dose toxo-equivalence model applied to two chemotherapy drugs, based on data from 169 published clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.