ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
CD4
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical phenotypes and molecular endotypes of chronic urticaria: Linking clinical expression to underlying immune mechanisms.Asia Pacific allergy · 2026Review
- T Cell/Mast Cell Crosstalk in the Skin of Patients Suffering From Immune-Mediated Diseases, Focusing on Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- Omalizumab Treated Urticaria Patients Display T Cell and Thrombocyte-Associated Gene Regulation.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse in chronic spontaneous Urticaria: a narrative review focusing on parameters available in routine clinical practice.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria: update on pathogenesis and therapeutic implications.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The proximity of activated T cells and mast cells in the lesional skin of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is held to contribute to the development of wheals and angioedema. In a previous study, we demonstrated that increased IL-17 expression in T cells and mast cells in skin lesions of patients with CSU is associated with T/mast cell proximity, but the mechanisms that drive T cell/mast cell co-localization remain unknown. Objectives: To assess if chemokines expressed in lesional CSU skin contribute to T cell/mast cell proximity. Patients and methods: Biopsies from lesional CSU skin were compared to biopsies from healthy skin for expression of CCR5 and its ligand CCL3 by CD4 Results: Numbers of CCR5-positive CD4 Conclusions: The close proximity of T cells and mast cells in the skin of severe CSU may be driven, at least in part by increased CCR5 and CCL3 expression. Therapies that target CCL3 interaction with CCR5 should be assessed for their effects in CSU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.