ArticleHeliyon2024
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and the epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infection two years later.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections before, during, and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a registry-based cohort study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Complications: A Narrative Literature Review of Vascular Care and Maintenance.International journal of vascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic increased catheter-related bloodstream infections (C-RBSI), but its subsequent impact has not been adequately described. Our hospital has already depicted the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the first wave. However, we still do not know whether C-RBSI rates and aetiology are similar to those described before the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the evolution of C-RBSI in a large tertiary teaching hospital two years later. Material and methods: We prospectively collected all confirmed C-RBSI episodes in a clinical microbiology laboratory database by matching blood cultures and catheter tip cultures with the isolation of the same microorganism (s). We compared our C-RBSI incidence rates and aetiology from 2018 to 2023. C-RBSI was defined as bacteremia or fungemia in a patient with clinical manifestations of infection and no other apparent source except the catheter. Results: During the study period, we collected 556 C-RBSI episodes. C-RBSI incidence rate per 1000 admissions each year was as follows: 2018: 2.2; 2019: 1.7; 2020: 3.29; 2021: 2.92; 2022: 2.69. and 2023: 2.01. Mainly, C-RBSI episodes occurring in critical care units each year were, respectively: 2018: 57 (54.8 %), 2019: 38 (45.2 %), 2020: 89 (63.6 %), 2021: 69 (60.5 %), 2022: 58 (50.9 %) and 2023 (61.4 %). The distribution of microorganisms showed an increase in Gram-negative episodes after the pandemic. Conclusion: Our study shows an increase in the incidence rate of C-RBSI during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a discrete decrease after that. C-RBSI episodes were mainly caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococci but with a rise in Gram-negative bacilli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.