Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104469›Full record

ArticleThe Linacre quarterly2024

Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles.

Hans-Georg Moeller, Paul J D'Ambrosio, Aglaja Stirn, Jorge Ponseti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Linacre quarterly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans-Georg MoellerDepartment of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of Macau, Macau.
Paul J D'AmbrosioInstitute of Modern Chinese Thought, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Aglaja StirnInstitute of General Medicine, Kiel University, Germany.
Jorge PonsetiInstitute of Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Kiel University, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-2906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between "profilicity," the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally-with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention-we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity.

Indexed as

authenticitygendergender dysphoriagender identitygender incongruencegender rolesidentityprofilicitytransgendertranssexualism

Identifiers

PMID39104469
PMCPMC11298103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.