ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Views and perceptions of advanced life support practitioners on initiating, withholding and terminating resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Emergency Medical Services of South Africa.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A resuscitation systems analysis for South Africa: A narrative review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to explore the views and perceptions of Advanced Life Support (ALS) practitioners in two South African provinces on initiating, withholding, and terminating resuscitation in OHCA. Methodology: Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted with operational ALS practitioners working within the prehospital setting in the Western Cape and Free State provinces. Recorded interviews were transcribed and subjected to inductive-dominant, manifest content analysis. After familiarisation with the data, meaning units were condensed, codes were applied and collated into categories that were then assessed, reviewed, and refined repeatedly. Results: A total of 18 ALS providers were interviewed. Five main categories were developed from the data analysis: 1) assessment of prognosis, 2) internal factors affecting decision-making, 3) external factors affecting decision-making, 4) system challenges, and 5) ideas for improvement. Factors influencing the assessment of prognosis were history, clinical presentation, and response to resuscitation. Internal factors affecting decision-making were driven by emotion and contemplation. External factors affecting decision-making included family, safety, and disposition. System challenges relating to bystander response and resources were identified. Ideas for improvement in training and support were brought forward. Conclusion: Many factors influence OHCA decision-making in the Western Cape and Free State provinces, and numerous system challenges have been identified. The findings of this study can be used as a frame of reference for prehospital emergency care personnel and contribute to the development of context-specific guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.