Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024

Causal associations among gut microbiota, 1400 plasma metabolites, and asthma: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Lizhu Wang, Zhe Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lizhu WangGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Zhe LvAir Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence indicates a correlation between imbalances in intestinal microbiota and changes in plasma metabolites in the progression of asthma. However, the causal link between these factors remains unclear. Methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was employed to evaluate the potential causal connection between gut microbiota, plasma metabolites, and asthma susceptibility. Gut microbiota data from expansive genome-wide genotype studies and 16S fecal microbiome datasets were examined by the MiBioGen Alliance. Asthma data were procured from the FinnGen biobank analysis, while comprehensive Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) summary statistics for plasma metabolites were derived from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. Fluctuations in intestinal flora and plasma metabolites in asthma patients were evaluated using the weighted mode method. Additionally, pleiotropic and heterogeneity analyses were performed to ascertain the reliability of the findings. Results: Upon examining the gut microbiota through MR with the IVW method, alongside tests for heterogeneity and pleiotropy, findings reveal a negative association between the abundance of the Christensenellaceae R.7 group and asthma risk. In contrast, the Bifidobacterium and Prevotella 7 genera exhibit a positive association with asthma risk, indicating they may be potential risk factors ( Conclusion: The current Mendelian randomization study provides evidence supporting a potential causal link between specific gut microbiota taxa, plasma metabolites, and asthma. These findings offer novel perspectives for future research and the development of treatment and prevention strategies for asthma.

Indexed as

asthmacausalityintestinal floraMendelian randomizationplasma metabolites

Identifiers

PMID39104371
PMCPMC11298384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.