Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104181›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2024

"Are you OK doctor?" An expanded health belief model exploration of doctors' experiences and perspectives of on-shift health behaviour.

Kirsty L Hodgson, Daniel J Lamport, Allán Laville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsty L HodgsonSchool of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9680-0445
Daniel J LamportSchool of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-0439
Allán LavilleSchool of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-9269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnderstanding doctors' health beliefs is essential for developing effective and competent healthcare practices that benefit doctors and their patients. This study aimed to qualitatively explore doctors' perceptions of on-shift health-protective behaviours and their perceived effects on competence.

methodsThe research applied theoretically driven Expanded Health Belief Model (EHBM) enquiry methods to explore beliefs and experiences through an occupational context survey, 14 individual depth interviews, and two focus groups. Semantic and deductive themes associated with EHBM domains were examined, and an inductive thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted.

resultsDoctors' beliefs were strongly imbued by their perceived identity within the systemic context; they expressed impaired self-efficacy in reacting to their health needs on shift, and several disclosed harm to themselves and patients. Dominant themes included the psychosocial effects of the systemic culture and the influence of the situational occupational context in impacting health-protective behavioural action. The context and implications of experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

conclusionsThis study presents key belief-oriented factors influencing doctors' health-protective behaviour at work and its implications for competent practice. Further doctor-led guidance on focus points for evidence-based theoretically driven health improvement solutions is provided regarding operational practice, formulating policies, developing interventions and further research.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health BehaviorHealth Belief ModelPhysiciansAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacyCOVID-19doctorshealth behaviourHealth belief modelhealthcarethematic analysisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39104181
PMCPMC11305022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.