Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39104048›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Perceived Benefit and Satisfaction With a Tablet Computer and an Emergency Smartwatch by Older Adults and Their Relatives: Prospective Real-World Pilot Study.

Patrick Wiegel, Marina Liselotte Fotteler, Brigitte Kohn, Sarah Mayer, Filippo Maria Verri, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick Wiegel *Research Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-7174
Marina Liselotte Fotteler *Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-1857
Brigitte KohnResearch Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0000-0001-8825-6198
Sarah MayerResearch Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-1794
Filippo Maria VerriResearch Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0009-0006-2840-8130
Dhayana DallmeierResearch Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-7023
Michael DenkingerResearch Unit on Ageing, Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Zollernring 26, Ulm, 89073, Germany, 49 731187 ext 191.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-060X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assistive technologies (ATs) have the potential to promote the quality of life and independent living of older adults and, further, to relieve the burden of formal and informal caregivers and relatives. Technological developments over the last decades have led to a boost of available ATs. However, evidence on the benefits and satisfaction with ATs in real-world applications remains scarce. Objective: This prospective, real-world, pilot study tested the perceived benefit and satisfaction with different ATs in the real-world environment. Methods: Community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 and their relatives tested a tablet computer with a simplified interface or a smartwatch with programmable emergency contacts for 8 weeks in their everyday life. Perceived benefits and satisfaction with ATs were assessed by all older adults and their relatives using different assessment tools before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included the Technology Usage Inventory, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Results: A total of 17 older adults (tablet computer: n=8, 47% and smartwatch: n=9, 53%) and 16 relatives (tablet computer: n=7, 44% and smartwatch: n=9, 56%) were included in the study. The number of participants that were frail (according to the Clinical Frailty Scale) and received care was higher in the smartwatch group than in the tablet computer group. Older adults of the smartwatch group reported higher technology acceptance (Technology Usage Inventory) and satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0) scores than those of the tablet computer group, although the differences were not significant (all P>.05). In the tablet computer group, relatives had significantly higher ratings on the item intention to use than older adults (t12.3=3.3, P=.006). Identified everyday issues with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure included contact/communication and entertainment/information for the tablet computer, safety and getting help in emergency situations for the smartwatch, and the usability of the AT for both devices. While the performance (t8=3.5, P=.008) and satisfaction (t8=3.2, P=.01) in these domains significantly improved in the smartwatch group, changes in the tablet computer group were inconsistent (all P>.05). Conclusions: This study highlights the remaining obstacles for the widespread and effective application of ATs in the everyday life of older adults and their relatives. While the results do not provide evidence for a positive effect regarding communication deficits, perceived benefits could be shown for the area of safety. Future research and technical developments need to consider not only the preferences, problems, and goals of older adults but also their relatives and caregivers to improve the acceptability and effectiveness of ATs.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldSelf-Help DevicesAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFamilyFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProspective Studiesassistive technologybenefitscaregivergerontechnologyolder adultsusability

Identifiers

PMID39104048
PMCPMC11310738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.