ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2024
Donor and newborn profiles and their influence on donation volume and duration: a cross-sectional study in a Spanish human milk bank.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential Donors' Awareness and Perceived Feasibility of Donating Human Milk in Australia.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman milk banks are essential facilities to provide donated human milk (DHM) to preterm and term infants with health complications. Little is known regarding milk bank donors and how their characteristics may influence the particularities of the donation process. The present study aims to assess characteristics of donors and their newborns to identify associations with the amount of DHM and initiation and donation time, during the first and second year of the milk bank operation in Córdoba, Spain.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in three periods: pre-opening of the milk bank (PRE) including all women who gave birth to a newborn between January - May 2017 and were hospital users; donors in the first year after the opening (Period 1 (P1): April 2019 - March 2020); and in the second year (P2: April 2020 - March 2021). For P1 and P2, DHM data were recorded. The relationships between donor and newborn characteristics and the donation process were examined using univariable and regression models.
resultsFrom 391 women interviewed in the PRE period, 55 (14%) showed intention to donate. In P1 and P2, there were 51 and 25 human milk (HM) donors, respectively. Age, gestational age (GA) and parity were similar between periods. In P2, a higher proportion of donors had higher education (P1: 46%; P2: 70.8%, p = 0.045). Around 40% of donors in both periods were on maternity leave. In P1, donors who had low birth weight infants (< 2500 g) donated more HM than those with infants weighing ≥ 2500 g (p = 0.020). In P2, women whose GA was < 37 weeks donated a higher volume vs. those with ≥ 37 weeks (p = 0.002). Maternity leave was linked to a shorter initiation time for donations in both periods (P1: p = 0.002; P2: p < 0.001).
conclusionsData obtained from a Spanish human milk bank indicate that prematurity and low birth weight appear to influence the amounts of DHM. Employment status might be a decisive factor in initiating HM donation. Additional efforts are required to identify shared donor characteristics that influence the initiation and volume of donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.