Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103927›Full record

ReviewImplementation science : IS2024

Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews.

Christina Kien, Julia Daxenbichler, Viktoria Titscher, Julia Baenziger, Pauline Klingenstein, Rahel Naef, Irma Klerings, Lauren Clack, Julian Fila, Isolde Sommer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Broadening sources of finance for health promotion and disease prevention: Smart capacitating investment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Promoting Nordic 'Green Care Practices'.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christina KienDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria. christina.kien@donau-uni.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2158-962X
Julia DaxenbichlerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Viktoria TitscherDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Julia BaenzigerInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pauline KlingensteinDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Irma KleringsDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Lauren ClackInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julian FilaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Isolde SommerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.

Funding

Gesellschaft für Forschungsförderung Niederösterreich GLF21-1-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing low-value care (LVC) is crucial to improve the quality of patient care while increasing the efficient use of scarce healthcare resources. Recently, strategies to de-implement LVC have been mapped against the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies. However, such strategies' effectiveness across different healthcare practices has not been addressed. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to investigate the effectiveness of de-implementation initiatives and specific ERIC strategy clusters.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) from 1 January 2010 to 17 April 2023 and used additional search strategies to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria, assessed the SR quality and extracted pre-specified data. We created harvest plots to display the results.

resultsOf 46 included SRs, 27 focused on drug treatments, such as antibiotics or opioids, twelve on laboratory tests or diagnostic imaging and seven on other healthcare practices. In categorising de-implementation strategies, SR authors applied different techniques: creating self-developed strategies (n = 12), focussing on specific de-implementation strategies (n = 14) and using published taxonomies (n = 12). Overall, 15 SRs provided evidence for the effectiveness of de-implementation interventions to reduce antibiotic and opioid utilisation. Reduced utilisation, albeit inconsistently significant, was documented in the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, as well as in laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging. Strategies within the adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and change infrastructure and workflow ERIC clusters led to a consistent reduction in LVC practices.

conclusionDe-implementation initiatives were effective in reducing medication usage, and inconsistent significant reductions were observed for LVC laboratory tests and imaging. Notably, de-implementation clusters such as change infrastructure and workflow and develop stakeholder interrelationships emerged as the most encouraging avenues. Additionally, we provided suggestions to enhance SR quality, emphasising adherence to guidelines for synthesising complex interventions, prioritising appropriateness of care outcomes, documenting the development process of de-implementation initiatives and ensuring consistent reporting of applied de-implementation strategies. REGISTRATION: OSF Open Science Framework 5ruzw.

Indexed as

Systematic Reviews as TopicDelivery of Health CareHumansImplementation ScienceQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareAntibioticde-implementationEffectivenessLaboratory testsLow-value careOverview of reviews

Identifiers

PMID39103927
PMCPMC11299416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.