Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103896›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2024

Role of CDK4 as prognostic biomarker in Soft Tissue Sarcoma and synergistic effect of its inhibition in dedifferentiated liposarcoma sequential treatment.

Silvia Vanni, Giacomo Miserocchi, Graziana Gallo, Valentina Fausti, Sofia Gabellone, Chiara Liverani, Chiara Spadazzi, Claudia Cocchi, Chiara Calabrese, Giovanni De Luca and 14 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Silvia VanniPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Giacomo MiserocchiPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy. giacomo.miserocchi@irst.emr.it.
Graziana GalloPathology Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Valentina FaustiClinical and Experimental Oncology, Immunotherapy, Rare Cancers and Biological Resource Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Sofia GabellonePreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Chiara LiveraniPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Chiara SpadazziPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Claudia CocchiPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Chiara CalabresePreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Giovanni De LucaPathology Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Massimo BassiMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Manlio GessaroliMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Nicola TomasettiMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Angelo CampobassiMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Federica PieriPathology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Giorgio ErcolaniGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Davide CavaliereGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Lorena GurrieriClinical and Experimental Oncology, Immunotherapy, Rare Cancers and Biological Resource Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Nada RivaClinical and Experimental Oncology, Immunotherapy, Rare Cancers and Biological Resource Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.
Federica RecineMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "San Giovanni Addolorata", Roma, Italy.
Toni IbrahimOsteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Innovative Therapies Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, 40136, Italy.
Laura MercataliOsteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Innovative Therapies Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, 40136, Italy.
Robin JonesSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alessandro De VitaPreclinic and Osteoncology Unit, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas represent an heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors comprising 1% of all solid malignancies. Among them, liposarcoma is one of the most common histotypes with atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS) as the major sub-entities. The unavailability of predictive, prognostic and druggable biomarkers makes the management of these lesions challenging. In recent years CDK4 and its inhibitors have emerged as potential agents for these lesions especially for ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS but the results are not conclusive and need to be elucidated. This study involved 21 ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS patients. Histological analyses of MDM2 and CDK4 were carried out. Moreover, a DDLPS patient-derived cancer model was established in vitro and in vivo assessing the efficacy of palbociclib in combination and sequential treatment. Finally, in silico analyses on CDK4 expression were carried out. The results showed a higher expression of CDK4 and MDM2 in DDLPS compared to ALT/WDLPS. Moreover, no correlation between MDM2 expression and CDK4 was observed. Next, in vitro analysis of CDK4 inhibitor palbociclib showed an antagonistic effect when combined to other chemotherapeutics, while it exhibited a significant synergy when administered in sequential schedule with lenvatinib. Next, in vivo analysis on DDLPS xenotransplanted embryos assessing the efficacy and safety profile of the in vitro tested schedules confirmed the observed data. This proof-of-concept study sheds light on the natural history of ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS and provides the rationale for the clinical applicability of sequential treatment with palbociclib in the management of DDLPS.

Identifiers

PMID39103896
PMCPMC11299298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.