ReviewJournal of translational medicine2024
Genetic factors in the pathogenesis of cardio-oncology.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversing the pipeline: a 'human-first' multi-omics approach to cardiovascular discovery.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Chemo-/radiotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy: roles of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Review
- Cardio-Oncology Risk Phenotypes in Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy: A Data-Driven Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular impacts of combination cancer therapies in Africa: challenges and solutions.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular toxicity: immunology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Review
- Characterization of anticancer therapy-induced microvascular dysfunction in patients with breast cancer supports targeted intervention.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Anthracycline- and HER2-induced cardiotoxicity: mechanisms, current strategies, and the emerging role of dapagliflozin as a targeted cardioprotective agent.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy-Associated Cardiotoxicity: Current Insights and Future Directions for Precision Cardio-Oncology.Cancers · 2025Review
- Navigating Cardiotoxicity in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Diagnosis to Long-Term Management.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Cardiotoxicity in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Review
- The mTOR Signaling Pathway: Key Regulator and Therapeutic Target for Heart Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Frailty: Can a Biological Aging Marker Enhance Precision Risk Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cardiotoxicity?JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, with advancements in medicine, the survival period of patients with tumours has significantly increased. The adverse effects of tumour treatment on patients, especially cardiac toxicity, have become increasingly prominent. In elderly patients with breast cancer, treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity has surpassed cancer itself as the leading cause of death. Moreover, in recent years, an increasing number of novel antitumour drugs, such as multitargeted agents, antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs), and immunotherapies, have been applied in clinical practice. The cardiotoxicity induced by these drugs has become more pronounced, leading to a complex and diverse mechanism of cardiac damage. The risks of unintended cardiovascular toxicity are increased by high-dose anthracyclines, immunotherapies, and concurrent radiation, in addition to traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and obesity. However, these factors do not fully explain why only a subset of individuals experience treatment-related cardiac toxicity, whereas others with similar clinical features do not. Recent studies indicate that genetics play a significant role in susceptibility to the development of cardiovascular toxicity from cancer therapies. These genes are involved in drug metabolism, oxidative damage, cardiac dysfunction, and other processes. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that epigenetics also plays a role in drug-induced cardiovascular toxicity. We conducted a review focusing on breast cancer as an example to help oncologists and cardiologists better understand the mechanisms and effects of genetic factors on cardiac toxicity. In this review, we specifically address the relationship between genetic alterations and cardiac toxicity, including chemotherapy-related genetic changes, targeted therapy-related genetic changes, and immune therapy-related genetic changes. We also discuss the role of epigenetic factors in cardiac toxicity. We hope that this review will improve the risk stratification of patients and enable therapeutic interventions that mitigate these unintended adverse consequences of life-saving cancer treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.