Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39103881›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2024

Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work?

Nicholas Powell, Hazel Dalton, Joanne Lawrence-Bourne, David Perkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using an asset mapping approach to evaluate the reach of community-level health equity interventions.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas PowellIndependent researcher. Formerly Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Hazel DaltonRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia. hdalton@csu.edu.au.
Joanne Lawrence-BourneIndependent researcher. Formerly Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Orange, NSW, Australia.
David PerkinsMental Health Policy Unit, Health Services Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government 4-DGEJZ1O/4-CW7UT14Health Administration Corporation (NSW Health, Mental Health Branch) G1600529Mental Health Commission of New South Wales, Australia SDG27658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing wellbeing at the community level, using a public health approach may build wellbeing and protective factors for all. A collaborative, community-owned approach can bring together experience, networks, local knowledge, and other resources to form a locally-driven, place-based initiative that can address complex issues effectively. Research on community empowerment, coalition functioning, health interventions and the use of local data provide evidence about what can be achieved in communities. There is less understanding about how communities can collaborate to bring about change, especially for mental health and wellbeing.

methodA comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify community wellbeing initiatives that address mental health. After screening 8,972 titles, 745 abstracts and 188 full-texts, 12 exemplar initiatives were identified (39 related papers).

resultsEight key principles allowed these initiatives to become established and operate successfully. These principles related to implementation and outcome lessons that allowed these initiatives to contribute to the goal of increasing community mental health and wellbeing. A framework for community wellbeing initiatives addressing principles, development, implementation and sustainability was derived from this analysis, with processes mapped therein.

conclusionThis framework provides evidence for communities seeking to address community wellbeing and avoid the pitfalls experienced by many well-meaning but short-lived initiatives.

Indexed as

Bottom-upCapacity buildingCo-designCollaborativeCommunityMental healthOwnershipWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39103881
PMCPMC11299278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.